I'm collecting the best written (not necessarily the ones I agree with, mind you) of the Philippine editorials about the troop pullout and de la Cruz's release, I'll be updating this post as I find them. If you have any to add, please feel free to email me or leave a comment. I'm also interested in good weblog entries, please pass your links on, I know they're out there.
Newspapers
Philippine Daily Inquirer:
All that the critics of the Philippine pullout from Iraq can bewail are either the "betrayal" of the Coalition of the Willing or the dire prospects of American or Australian vengeance on our country. But the vengeance that the critics of the country should fear comes from a possible one at the hands of their own citizens. Is it any surprise that an American administration that lost the popular vote, now talks of-get this-a "no-el" scenario for the United States, with a supposed terrorist bogey that threatens to disrupt the November elections?
In truth, the Philippine government has embraced its own people, something beyond the ken of leaders such as Howard and Bush, and even Blair, who are famously contemptuous of public opinion at home. This is what happens when terrorism is fought with totalitarian methods: It results in a totalitarian contempt for public opinion. The problem, as Blair, Bush and Howard may eventually find out, is that they suffer from the myopia of dictators while still being subject to being turned out of office by their own people.
The Philippines can at least say that it was willing, as the Spaniards were willing, to pay the price of democracy. Which is: to listen to the people; to obey the injunction that public office requires listening to the public; and living up to the higher considerations that are supposed to motivate democracies.
Conrado de Quiros (PDI):
There is one lesson we should particularly take to heart: It's time we buried "special relations" in a shallow and unmarked grave. The United States has its interests, we have our own, and ne'er the twain shall meet. Not in these days when we have more than a million workers in the Middle East. That is the official figure, but if an editor of a Saudi paper I talked to some years ago is to be believed, the actual number is probably twice that. We have no business jeopardizing their welfare by depicting some of their hosts as the bad guys in a Holy Crusade to end evil. Joining a war against one of their own in the name of freeing them from their cruel ways is playing Russian roulette with the OFWs' lives. The wonder is not that De la Cruz was kidnapped and threatened with beheading, the wonder is that they did not do it sooner.
More than that, we have no business jeopardizing the very future of this country. As it is, our OFWs are facing stiff competition from other countries that have made it a policy to upgrade their workers' skills while keeping their prices low. Our OFWs' dollar remittances are what keep this country afloat. It boggles the mind to think of what would happen to us if the Arab countries should take offense at our warmongering and start ticking off our workers. They certainly do not lack for provocation. I don't know why our government thinks it can be as reckless in foreign policy as it is in national policy. In national policy, you can always say, "Ay, mali" ["Oops, error"] and bank on the Filipino capacity for amnesia to "put the thing behind us." In foreign policy, there is the devil to pay. Heads will roll, literally. That is something De la Cruz's abduction should settle once and for all.
Raul Palabrica (PDI):
For giving in to the demand of the Iraqi kidnappers of Angelo de la Cruz instead of following the United States' no-negotiation policy with terrorists, the administration of President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo has become a pariah in the US Department of State. The decision to pull out the Philippine humanitarian contingent from that embattled nation was described by the Department of State as a capitulation to terrorism that sends the wrong signal to terrorists all over the world.
The Washington Times, a newspaper that is known to mouth the line of whichever political party is in power in the United States, commented that "Manila's act of cowardice... proves to terrorists that kidnapping and executing innocent civilians can successfully pressure government to cave in to their demands."
(..) In accusing the Philippine government of weakness in dealing with De la Cruz's kidnappers, the United States has conveniently forgotten that it had violated several times its much-ballyhooed policy of not negotiating with or giving in to the demands of terrorists.
Teodoro C. Benigno (Philippine Star):
Events have proved beyond any doubt that war was not America’war, but George W. Bush’s "war of revenge" based on premises the US citizenry now rejects, and the US Senate en banc has exposed as a fraud.The doughty Senate now declares after a thorough inquiry the war on Iraq was based on lies, lies, and more lies. If that is so, our enrollment in that war was also a big mistake. And if it was a mistake, our government must rectify that mistake by pulling out. And so it has pulled out. So many other countries have pulled out like Spain, Nicaragua, Honduras. Thailand wants to pull out along with several others. And don’t believe the canard the Philippines will pay for that "betrayal". Betrayal, my Aunt Matilda’s foot!
In the swim of the great, the powerful, their clashes, their battles, the Philippines does not count at all, or not very much.
And yet, whatever its frustrations, America will still need the Philippines for its geo-political designs in Asia. Our sea lanes still remain strategic and indispensable for naval and commercial navigation. Our land area for US troop withdrawal, training,and maneuver cannot be replaced by Indonesia or Malaysia, which are Muslim countries. Washington urgently sought return for its combat troops to the Philippines more than three years ago for joint maneuvers close to China and along the South China Sea. And also to combat terrorism.
(...) So forget all that hot and pretentious hoosh America is going to punish us. In fact, all this sound and fury about Angelo de la Cruz will become forgotten three months from now. The trend in Iraq is towards evacuation by US and coalition trooops. And an eagerly awaited thankover of government by the Iraqis themselves. Get out before it becomes another Vietnam. Another Angola. And yes, Mr. US Ambassador, we do know how to distinguish our friends from our enemies.
Ana Marie Pamintuan (Philippine Star):
Our allies must surely know enough about Philippine politics and culture to understand why the President did what she did. But confidence in our country has been shaken in capitals that — let’s admit it — are among the biggest contributors to Philippine development efforts.
That confidence has to be regained, and lengthy explanations about the how and why of Manila’s response to the hostage crisis won’t be enough. We might have to wait for another crisis to come along – let’s hope not the same type – before we can prove that we have the national backbone to stand by our commitments. Jingoists trying to influence national policy can ship out to hermit states like North Korea.
No nation can stand alone – not even the world’s lone superpower, as it has seen in Iraq. Our country in particular cannot stand alone, having relied too long on foreigners for far too many things, from food and medical aid to crime laboratory equipment and military aircraft. We have a terrorist problem exacerbated by Islamic militants from Indonesia that we can’t deal with by ourselves. We have millions of Filipinos working abroad, many of them in conflict areas where they are open to all types of attacks.
Being part of the community of nations carries with it certain responsibilities. Those responsibilities we cannot abandon as easily as we ignore the responsibilities that come with freedoms we enjoy in our dysfunctional democracy.
Gerry N. Gonzaga (Manila Times):
She has apparently a bigger stake in saving Angelo’s life on ground that allowing him to die could spark a fuse to instability. In the long run, if her government is undermined by instability, she could not stick to her administration’s international commitment. She may not even last till the end of her six-year term if she is weakened by any disenchantment. There will be no international commitment to pursue if she is booted out of office. So in saving de la Cruz’s head, she may also be saving her own political skin.
If she survives this test, she can later mend fences with our allies, and she has six years to do that. Anyway, it’s not only the Philippines that had withdrawn troops from Iraq ahead of schedule. Spain, the Dominican Republic, Nicaragua and Honduras have all pulled their troops out of Iraq. Some countries find it uneasy sending or keeping troops there after it was revealed that there are no weapons of mass destruction anywhere in Iraq and that Saddam Hussein had no link to Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaeda, the two justifications for the coalition’s occupation of Iraq. Under the circumstances, domestic concern weighs more for Mrs. Arroyo and a pullout is the best option.
Weblogs
Iggy (Bang and Blame):
E pakyu kang gaga ka. For the first time nga ang gobyerno namin, take note, NAMIN, ay umaksyon ayon sa interest ng bansa NAMIN, hindi ng bansa MO. Ang problema kasi sa mga ‘kanong tulad ni Michelle ay masyado nilang isinasapuso ang kantang “We Are The World”, meaning: Ang interes ng US ay interes ng lahat. Unang-una, lumundag ba sa tuwa ang mayoridad ng mga pinoy nang isabak kami ni GMA sa giyerang iyan? Hello. Ang dami na ngang problema ng Pilipinas pati ba naman giyera ng ibang bansa pro-problemahin pa namin. Bakit ba hindi nalang siya naging neutral noon, for the sake man lamang ng mga kapatid nating Muslim sa Mindanao. Kung umasta si GMA noon aakalaian mong 52nd state ng US ang Pilipinas, at parang mas may responsibilidad pa tayo sa kanila kaysa sa sarili nating mamamayan.
ederic:
Samantalang, praning lang ba ako, o sadyang nagkakaisa ang American media organizations sa paggamit ng "after Manila gave in to kidnappers' demands" sa kanilang mga balita? Kadalasan, hindi binabanggit na ito rin ang demand ng mga mamamayang Pilipino.
The Sassy Lawyer:
It is sad that many Filipinos--including the media--cannot comprehend the pullout issue beyond the Angelo de la Cruz kidnapping. The Philippines’ support for the U.S. in its war against Iraq, and the subsequent pullout of the the humantiarian contingent, is not just about the kidnapping of one man. It is about all of us. It is about what we believe in and we stand for. It is about our sense of justice and humanity.
adobo (limp bwizit):
i have a crazy plan. i'll work as a hosto in japan and slaughter the first japanese to make sexual advances on me. i'll get caught and i'll be sentenced to death (is there death penalty in japan?) and i would invoke innocence, frame-up, discrimination, maltreatment, abuse and stuff. then people back here would hold vigils and they would be marching on the streets, calling for the president to make a diplomatic protest. TV networks would feature my life story and the story about a young lawyer who got disillusioned with the corrupt judicial system and lack of economic opportunities in his homeland so he instead chose to work in japan would melt everyone's heart. then that would make the call to cut ties with japan louder and then the stories about world war 2 and the unpaid comfort women and the abuses of the imperial army would be taken up.
then the government of japan, recognizing its world war 2 liabilities to the philippines and as an act of grace, would release me and send me home. then i'll be an instant celebrity here. i'll guest in every talk show, make a courtesy call to the president, and a movie about my life would be made. the government would then give me a post in the foreign service and that would likely be an appointment as a legal attache to a country where there are so many reported abuses of filipino workers.
i'll perform my job well and see to it that not a single abusive word is said about my countrymen. i'll do it so well that the government of the country to which i am assigned would get irritated by me and they would request the president to recall me or declare me a persona non grata. the president would then recall me and i'll go home and hold a press conference immediately after my arrival. i'll tell the filipino people : LOOK AT WHAT THIS GOVERNMENT DID TO ME. I MERELY TRIED TO PROTECT THE HONOR AND DIGNITY OF OUR BAGONG BAYANIS ABROAD AND I WAS PENALIZED FOR IT. JUST LOOK AT THE PRIORITY OF THIS GOVERNMENT - THEY PUT FOREIGN RELATIONS ABOVE THE HONOR AND DIGNITY OF OUR POOR DOMESTIC HELPERS AND CONSTRUCTION WORKERS - OUR BAGONG BAYANIS DON'T DESERVE THIS.
trust me, i'll get a senate seat after that. i'll probably break mar roxas' record.