Armida Siguion-Reyna is sorta kinda maybe supporting Fernando Poe, Jr if he decides to run for president next year:
She said the reason why the country has not prospered was the lack of a model that would inspire the people to do great things for themselves and for the country.
"Gusto ba natin ang mga nakaupo sa Malacañang ngayon?" Siguion-Reyna said during the news conference. "We don't need an economist. We don't need a lawyer."
Clearly she's fallen off her rocker, and hard, if she actually believes what she's saying. (And if she doesn't and she's saying it anyway, then she's a scumbag.)
If anything one of the main reasons why the Philippines is so unsuccessful is because so many pin their hopes on others (the national government, politicians, the church, local bigwigs, relatives who are better off) or worse yet, dumb luck (lotto, betting on jueting, game shows) instead of taking responsibility for their own lives and their own futures.
How many people effectively sell their votes and lifelong loyalties to a mayor just because he gives them handouts, never questioning where the money comes from or why none of that money ever makes it to their area hospitals or schools? How many people say they don't have enough money to put their kids through school but then turn right around and buy full-blown entertainment systems so they can watch vcds and sing karaoke with the neighbors? Why is it that we have a painful dearth of entrepreneurs, especially compared to our Southeast Asian neighbors? People are deathly afraid to go into business for themselves despite the fact that that's how the rich get rich and then get richer. The four richest men in the Philippines all started out dirt poor children of Chinese immigrants, and had to struggle with poverty and racism to be successful—what's everyone else's excuse not to try?
Excuse me lang, Tita Midz, but we don't need a role model in Malacañang to inspire our people—or for that matter, more role models. We have plenty of them everywhere. Every doctor who chooses to practice in a rural area, every teacher or nurse who chooses to stay in the country even though they'd make more money in a month working abroad than a year at home, every person who gives up years with their family to work abroad so their loved ones can have better lives is a role model. Every college graduate who gives up white collar paychecks to work for an NGO, every girl who leaves the Visayas for Manila to work as a katulong so she can send her siblings to school is a role model. Honestly, if you asked any Filipino success story who their role model was, would any of them name a Philippine president? I don't think you'd find a single one. (Except maybe children of Philippine presidents, but hey, that's public relations so it doesn't count.)
Maybe we don't need an economist, or a lawyer, or a general in office. But we've tried people who were ill-prepared for office twice (in history and my lifetime both)—Cory, the Radcliffe-educated heiress who chose to be a politician's housewife, and Erap, the actor who couldn't be bothered to do basic things like prepare for meetings or even show up for them even when he was a mayor, just like he couldn't be bothered to finish high school—and they were both disasters. I have yet to hear a single argument, compelling or otherwise, on why FPJ would be any different.
On another note, in the same article (Siguion-Reyna's half-brother) former senator Juan Ponce Enrile says he will "support whoever would be the standard bearer of the opposition. If it happens to be FPJ, "I will support him 100 percent." Not that he would ever run for president, but imagine anyone justifying supporting FPJ or Ping Lacson over Juan Flavier. It boggles the mind.